Memory (2023)

Jessica Chastain and Peter Sarsgaard in an emotional scene, sitting closely in a bathtub, with the film title ‘MEMORY’ displayed in large letters. Text highlights their accolades: Jessica Chastain as an Academy Award winner and Peter Sarsgaard as a Venice Film Festival Volpi Cup winner.

Memory is a thought-provoking drama that explores complicated subjects including trauma, dementia, and human connection. The film follows Sylvia, a social worker and recovering alcoholic, whose routine is disrupted when Saul, a man with early-onset dementia, follows her home from their high school reunion. As their paths cross, both characters are forced to confront their pasts while seeking solace in each other’s companionship.

Michel Franco’s directing is calm and unobtrusive, enabling the plot to develop gradually. He isn’t afraid to let silence speak volumes, producing a sense of discomfort and reflection. The pacing, while thoughtful, occasionally borders on languid, especially in the early half. Some viewers may find themselves checking their watches during these slower periods.

Jessica Chastain gives a subtle portrayal as Sylvia, expressing both her character’s sensitivity and strength with equal finesse. Her portrayal of a woman dealing with past tragedy is both honest and restrained, never falling into melodrama. Peter Sarsgaard’s performance as Saul is equally outstanding, adding sympathetic empathy to his character’s struggle with memory loss. The chemistry between Chastain and Sarsgaard is obvious, making their odd relationship feel genuine and moving.

The film’s investigation of memory, both its trustworthiness and its impact on our sense of self, is its strongest point. Franco expertly blends together themes of tragedy, forgiveness, and the yearning for connection in a society where people can feel isolated. While these issues are mostly handled sensitively, the script’s approach sometimes feels a little heavy-handed.

Cinematographer Yves Cape’s muted colour palette and intimate framing choices match the film’s sombre tone. The use of natural light and some handheld camera work contributes to the impression of authenticity, yet some may find the visual style a little bland. The score is subtle but effective, accentuating the emotional beats without dominating. However, there are times when the silence feels more powerful than the music itself.

One of the film’s merits is its refusal to present simple answers or neat solutions. It deals with morally problematic circumstances while allowing its characters to be flawed and complex. This method may irritate viewers who like more straightforward storylines, but it adds depth and realism to the story.

While Memory addresses serious issues, it occasionally blunders in its execution. Some plot developments appear forced, and some supporting characters are underdeveloped. The film’s pacing flaws and occasional heavyhandedness keep it from reaching its full potential.

Despite its weaknesses, Memory is nonetheless a captivating and emotionally evocative film. It’s not an easy watch, and it’s certainly not for everyone, but those who are ready to invest in its slow-burn plot will find enough to enjoy. The performances alone are worth watching, and the film’s exploration of human perseverance in the face of grief and loss is deeply compelling.

In the end, Memory is a fine, if uneven, drama that features strong performances and addresses vital issues. Even if it falls short of its lofty goals, the film is intelligent and emotionally engaging, and its impact will linger long after the theatre doors close. If you’re looking for a complex, character-driven drama that doesn’t shy away from difficult topics, Memory is well worth your time.

Rating: 3.5 out of 5.